🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his desire to see opponents investigated, exerting pressure on the DOJ to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's killing our standing and trustworthiness," the leader stated last month in a Truth Social message.

"I was impeached me, and indicted me (5 times!)" he declared, referencing the four criminal cases he faced after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Both have subsequently been charged, in cases that numerous experts have said seem to be driven by politics and challenging to win in legal proceedings.

But the latest allegations against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal specialists and ex-prosecutors assert.

"I would say, contrasting Bolton's case to James' is like comparing two different things," stated Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

The Details of Bolton's Case

Bolton has been criminally indicted on national allegations pertaining to the alleged improper handling of sensitive materials. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a vocal presidential opponent, going so far as to call him "stunningly uninformed" and unfit for the presidency in his memoir.

Experts say that while there may be political motivations to go after Bolton, the procedures used to secure an indictment and the proof gathered against him indicate a potentially stronger legal argument than the Justice Department brought against Comey.

"These actions that's being claimed is simultaneously more serious and seems to have occurred over a significant period of time," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his tenure as Trump's national security adviser, and after his 2019 White House exit, authorities alleged that Bolton placed the country at risk by improperly keeping and sending sensitive documents to family members using unprotected methods, including AOL. Some of the documents were labeled highly classified.

The charge alleges that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's system where files were stored and transmitted an seeming warning to cause "the biggest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on recently to eighteen distinct counts of improperly handling classified information.

Retribution or a Strong Legal Argument?

The schedule of his charge - coming on the tails of charges against James - has renewed questions about external influence on the justice system.

Trump previously implied Bolton should be in jail, and called him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his role, authored a book about his experience in the Trump administration that was sharply negative of the leader.

"There's no question that the schedule of this indictment, when combined with additional cases, has prompted questions about the strength of these charges, and the reason these charges are being brought now," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and director of the National Security Institute.

Nevertheless, he added, "if the Justice Department is capable to prove the facts alleged and show the information is correctly designated, his behavior may certainly have violated the statute".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking figure for mishandling classified documents is "rare" but not without precedent, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern sensitive materials present challenges to try, but they may and are brought against both junior and senior officials, from occasionally," she explained.

Similarities to Examinations into Former President and President

Trump likewise encountered charges of improperly storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and hindering their return, but that case was eventually dismissed by a federal judge and voided by his return as leader.

A independent investigator also determined that former President Joe Biden improperly maintained classified documents from his time as vice president, but failed to prosecute him.

Bolton's situation shares characteristics to Trump's sensitive materials matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top national security position at the DOJ.

Rigorous protocols regulate the handling of classified documents. To win a guilty verdict, the government must prove that Bolton knew the information he was transmitting was classified, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone not entitled to obtain it.

"Due to the classified character of the information at question in this matter, we don't have a great deal of particulars about why the prosecution believes elements like the personal notes and the additional material he communicated by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Traditional Legal Action

The process by which the Justice Department brought this case will be closely examined, following Trump openly expressed his desire to see his critics prosecuted and several of those indictments materialized.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's situation, authorities seem to have adhered to standard procedure.

"The Bolton prosecution and ultimately the charge appeared to have observed the standard process including the rules and standards within the DOJ," he said.

In contrast to Comey's brief, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "traditional" document that "clearly sets forth the details concerning the facts and situation here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It appears fairly aligned with a series of precedents... where public servants improperly handled and shared classified material."